(English) Despite Aid, Borrowers Still Face Foreclosure in the US

(English) February 21st, 2013

By 

Danette Rivera, a 38-year-old single mother, said Bank of America was foreclosing on her because of a troubled first mortgage. Photo: Uli Seit for The New York Times

A year after five of the nation’s biggest banks reached a pact with state and federal officials over claims of vast foreclosure abuses, the banks are taking credit for giving more than half a million struggling homeowners roughly $45.8 billion in relief.

But despite the banner numbers released on Thursday in a report by Joseph A. Smith, the independent overseer of the settlement, thousands of homeowners are still not getting the help they need to save their homes from foreclosure, according to interviews with housing advocates and homeowners facing foreclosure.

Just under 71,000 borrowers, or 13 percent of the total borrowers helped so far, received assistance on their primary mortgage, which has been the main source of defaults and foreclosures through the housing crisis. But more than 170,000 homeowners received assistance on their second mortgage, which typically is a home equity line of credit that borrowers can tap for cash.

Even though addressing second mortgages does offer some relief to homeowners, in a troubling number of instances the banks are not providing any help with the first mortgage, the housing advocates said. That leaves the homeowners still in jeopardy of losing their homes, while giving banks credit for restructuring loans or wiping out debt under the settlement.

“The second mortgage forgiveness is basically a loophole, which allows the banks to continue foreclosures unabated,” said Elizabeth M. Lynch, a lawyer at MFY Legal Services in New York.

Based on the monitor’s report, it is impossible to tell how many homeowners who received help on their second mortgage are still facing foreclosure on their first mortgage. Ms. Lynch and other advocates estimate that thousands of homeowners across the country are in that predicament.

Banks say they are working to assist homeowners and to fulfill all their obligations under the settlement. And Shaun Donovan, the secretary of housing and urban development, which helped broker the deal with the five banks, said on Thursday that the settlement had already “exceeded expectations.”

Mr. Smith said, “I believe we have made progress, but I know that there is much more work to be done.”

When Danette Rivera, a 38-year-old single mother, received a letter from Bank of America in July alerting her that it was forgiving her second mortgage of about $115,000, she said she was elated. Ms. Rivera said she thought the assistance would save the home in Queens she shares with her two children.

But that hope, she said, was dashed when she learned a month later that Bank of America was foreclosing on her because of her troubled first mortgage. “This house means everything to my family and I am terrified we are going to be homeless again,” Ms. Rivera said. The bank, citing customer privacy concerns, declined to comment.

At its outset, the settlement was trumpeted as a way to hold banks accountable for foreclosure abuses and help homeowners harmed when the housing bubble burst, sending the housing market to its lowest level since the Great Depression. As of early 2012, roughly four million Americans were in foreclosure since the start of 2007, with abandoned properties marring states including Arizona, California and Florida.

The deal with the five largest servicers — Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup,JPMorgan ChaseWells Fargo — arose from a sweeping investigation by the 50 state attorneys general after revelations in 2010 that banks were churning through hundreds of foreclosure documents without examining them for accuracy.

Initially, the banks resisted reducing mortgage debt, but the attorneys general insisted that debt reduction was critical to the plan. Under the terms of the settlement, the banks receive a variety of credits based on the kind of relief that they provide. For example, banks that offer short sales to homeowners earn at most 45 cents on the dollar. For extinguishing second mortgages for borrowers who are more than 180 days behind on payments, the banks receive 10 cents on the dollar.

The bulk of the relief, according to the monitor’s report, comes from short sales, which housing advocates say do not actually keep homeowners in their properties. In the sales, banks agree to let homeowners sell their houses for less than the outstanding debt owed. Short sales are among the simplest form of relief, particularly because they are a palatable alternative for the banks, which typically incur lower losses on the sales than on foreclosures. Through short sales, banks forgave about $19.5 billion in debt on an estimated 169,000 properties, according to the report. As the housing market plummeted, millions of Americans were unable to sell their homes because they had lost so much value.

Banks are modifying or forgiving second mortgages at a fast clip, according to the report, but they are far more reluctant to write off first mortgage debt. The banks took credit for modifying or wiping out roughly $7.4 billion in debt on first mortgages held by 70,810 borrowers. In total, banks provided about $11.6 billion of relief on second mortgages, assisting 170,339 borrowers. But a number of those homeowners are still shouldering payments on their first mortgage they simply cannot afford, according to interviews with borrowers and housing advocates.

Bank of America, for example, offered about $9.8 billion in relief on second mortgages — more than three times the $3.4 billion in help for first mortgages. Under the settlement, the lender, based in Charlotte, N.C., was on responsible for providing a large portion of the total relief.

In a statement on Thursday, the bank said that when it came to second mortgages “99 percent of our customers who were offered this program, accepted it, which demonstrates the value of the program and that customers saw this as meaningful relief that would  help to improve their financial position.” By helping borrowers on their second mortgage, the bank said it could help stave off foreclosure, because it made “a reasonable payment through modification more attainable.” The second mortgage aid can also remove a barrier for homeowners who want to sell their properties.

While the second lien deal often does not help borrowers, it does benefit the banks, according to Mark Ladov, a lawyer at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. When a house is sold at foreclosure, there is typically no money to pay the second mortgage anyway. Routinely, the holder of the second loan gets nothing. Under the terms of the settlement, though, the banks receive credit for forgiving the second mortgage even though they most likely would not have gotten any money for it.

In New York, the numbers are stark. So far, 18.5 percent of bank credits for relief under the settlement come from changes to first mortgages, compared with 52.3 percent for second mortgage relief.

The information contained in the report on Thursday was submitted by the banks and has not yet been independently verified.

 

Source: The New York Times

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *